From jbalakri at gmail.com  Mon Jun  6 16:03:55 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
Message-ID: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>

I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.

InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1

Thanks
JB


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Wed Jun  8 16:29:55 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:55 +0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>

Hi Jawahar.

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
> 

The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
FreeBSD).  As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:

  // Assume we are on Linux if here
  #define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1

This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.

I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.

Regards,
  Dmitry

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650

> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
> 
> Thanks
> JB
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at web-polygraph.org
> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From jbalakri at gmail.com  Wed Jun  8 17:39:08 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>

Dmitry

Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
getting a different error..

init2.c:37:  assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Any thoughts?
Thanks
JB



On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
<dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> Hi Jawahar.
>
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
>> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
>>
>
> The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
> Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
> Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
> FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
> define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
>
> ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
> ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
>
> This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
> Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
>
> I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
>
> Regards,
> ?Dmitry
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>
>> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
>> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
>> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
>> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
>> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
>>
>> Thanks
>> JB
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at web-polygraph.org
>> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Wed Jun  8 17:58:56 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:58:56 +0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dmitry
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
> getting a different error..
> 
> init2.c:37:  assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> Any thoughts?

This is a gcc bug.  I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
I tried.  Are you using an unstable gcc version?  Updating gcc should
help.

Regards,
  Dmitry

> Thanks
> JB
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jawahar.
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
> >>
> >
> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
> >
> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
> >
> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
> >
> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
> >
> > Regards,
> > ?Dmitry
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
> >
> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> JB
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >


From jbalakri at gmail.com  Wed Jun  8 18:21:21 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:21:21 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>

I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
build the latest version...

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
<dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dmitry
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
>> getting a different error..
>>
>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
> help.
>
> Regards,
> ?Dmitry
>
>> Thanks
>> JB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Jawahar.
>> >
>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
>> >>
>> >
>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
>> >
>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
>> >
>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
>> >
>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > ?Dmitry
>> >
>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>> >
>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> JB
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Users mailing list
>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >
>


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Tue Jun 14 16:52:33 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:52:33 +0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>

Hi Jawahar.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:53:18 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dmitry
> 
> I installed gcc 4.4.2 and am trying to install polygraph and i got the
> following 2 errors
> 
> 1) it complains about not finding zlin 1.2.0.4 or later but have 1.2.5 installed
> 

Is it installed in non-standard path (i.e. not in /usr)?  If this is the
case, try configure --with-zlib=/path/to/zlib.  This path should have
zlib headers (in include/) and library (in lib/).

> 2) so i tried  with the -without-zlib option and then i get this error
> 
> In file included from ZLib.cc:9:0:
> ../../src/xstd/ZLib.h:14:29: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration
> mv -f .deps/ZLib.Tpo .deps/ZLib.Po
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src   -g -O3
> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -MT gadgets.o -MD -MP -MF
> .deps/gadgets.Tpo -c -o gadgets.o gadgets.cc
> gadgets.cc: In function 'double xceil(double, double)':
> gadgets.cc:32:41: error: 'ceilf' was not declared in this scope
> gadgets.cc:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> make[3]: *** [gadgets.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 

Polygraph checks if ceilf(3) is available on the system.  Apparently,
Solaris has ceilf(3) implemented (that is why the configure check
succeeds), but does not declare it in math.h.  Attached patch is a
workaround to avoid ceilf(3) usage.

Regards,
  Dmitry

> JB
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
> > build the latest version...
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Dmitry
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
> >>> getting a different error..
> >>>
> >>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
> >>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
> >>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
> >>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
> >>> Please submit a full bug report,
> >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> >>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> >>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
> >> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
> >> help.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> ?Dmitry
> >>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> >>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Jawahar.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
> >>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
> >>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
> >>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
> >>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
> >>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
> >>> >
> >>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
> >>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
> >>> >
> >>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
> >>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
> >>> >
> >>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > ?Dmitry
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
> >>> >
> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
> >>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
> >>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks
> >>> >> JB
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Users mailing list
> >>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
> >>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>> >
> >>
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: do-not-use-ceilf.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 894 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.web-polygraph.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110614/0ef1e2d8/attachment.patch>

From jbalakri at gmail.com  Tue Jun 14 17:04:10 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:04:10 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTinsd5p7tNDeoGNQnav4_=R64Ehokg@mail.gmail.com>

I did try the --with-zlib=/usr/local and it does says it finds it but
then it complains about not having the gzip compression feature...I'll
try the patch now.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
<dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> Hi Jawahar.
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:53:18 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dmitry
>>
>> I installed gcc 4.4.2 and am trying to install polygraph and i got the
>> following 2 errors
>>
>> 1) it complains about not finding zlin 1.2.0.4 or later but have 1.2.5 installed
>>
>
> Is it installed in non-standard path (i.e. not in /usr)? ?If this is the
> case, try configure --with-zlib=/path/to/zlib. ?This path should have
> zlib headers (in include/) and library (in lib/).
>
>> 2) so i tried ?with the -without-zlib option and then i get this error
>>
>> In file included from ZLib.cc:9:0:
>> ../../src/xstd/ZLib.h:14:29: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration
>> mv -f .deps/ZLib.Tpo .deps/ZLib.Po
>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src ? -g -O3
>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -MT gadgets.o -MD -MP -MF
>> .deps/gadgets.Tpo -c -o gadgets.o gadgets.cc
>> gadgets.cc: In function 'double xceil(double, double)':
>> gadgets.cc:32:41: error: 'ceilf' was not declared in this scope
>> gadgets.cc:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>> make[3]: *** [gadgets.o] Error 1
>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>
> Polygraph checks if ceilf(3) is available on the system. ?Apparently,
> Solaris has ceilf(3) implemented (that is why the configure check
> succeeds), but does not declare it in math.h. ?Attached patch is a
> workaround to avoid ceilf(3) usage.
>
> Regards,
> ?Dmitry
>
>> JB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
>> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
>> > build the latest version...
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Dmitry
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
>> >>> getting a different error..
>> >>>
>> >>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
>> >>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
>> >>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
>> >>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
>> >>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> >>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>> >>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
>> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
>> >> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
>> >> help.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> ?Dmitry
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> JB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> >>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi Jawahar.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
>> >>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
>> >>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
>> >>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
>> >>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
>> >>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
>> >>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
>> >>> >
>> >>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
>> >>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Regards,
>> >>> > ?Dmitry
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
>> >>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
>> >>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thanks
>> >>> >> JB
>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> Users mailing list
>> >>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
>> >>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >
>


From jbalakri at gmail.com  Thu Jun 16 13:51:19 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:51:19 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinsd5p7tNDeoGNQnav4_=R64Ehokg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinsd5p7tNDeoGNQnav4_=R64Ehokg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikqhF6sRrBVMkK+xe5=YAY5cgPsTw@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry I am getting a different error. I started testing on a brand new server

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src   -g -O3
-Wall -Ww
                                             rite-strings
-Woverloaded-virtual -MT PolyApp.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/PolyApp.Tpo -c

                                 -o PolyApp.o PolyApp.cc
/usr/include/net/if.h:99: error: template argument required for ?struct map?
make[3]: *** [PolyApp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/app'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
make: *** [all] Error 2


On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
<jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> I did try the --with-zlib=/usr/local and it does says it finds it but
> then it complains about not having the gzip compression feature...I'll
> try the patch now.
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jawahar.
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:53:18 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>> I installed gcc 4.4.2 and am trying to install polygraph and i got the
>>> following 2 errors
>>>
>>> 1) it complains about not finding zlin 1.2.0.4 or later but have 1.2.5 installed
>>>
>>
>> Is it installed in non-standard path (i.e. not in /usr)? ?If this is the
>> case, try configure --with-zlib=/path/to/zlib. ?This path should have
>> zlib headers (in include/) and library (in lib/).
>>
>>> 2) so i tried ?with the -without-zlib option and then i get this error
>>>
>>> In file included from ZLib.cc:9:0:
>>> ../../src/xstd/ZLib.h:14:29: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration
>>> mv -f .deps/ZLib.Tpo .deps/ZLib.Po
>>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src ? -g -O3
>>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -MT gadgets.o -MD -MP -MF
>>> .deps/gadgets.Tpo -c -o gadgets.o gadgets.cc
>>> gadgets.cc: In function 'double xceil(double, double)':
>>> gadgets.cc:32:41: error: 'ceilf' was not declared in this scope
>>> gadgets.cc:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>>> make[3]: *** [gadgets.o] Error 1
>>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> Polygraph checks if ceilf(3) is available on the system. ?Apparently,
>> Solaris has ceilf(3) implemented (that is why the configure check
>> succeeds), but does not declare it in math.h. ?Attached patch is a
>> workaround to avoid ceilf(3) usage.
>>
>> Regards,
>> ?Dmitry
>>
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
>>> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
>>> > build the latest version...
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>>> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Dmitry
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
>>> >>> getting a different error..
>>> >>>
>>> >>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
>>> >>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
>>> >>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
>>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
>>> >>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
>>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
>>> >>> Please submit a full bug report,
>>> >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>>> >>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>>> >>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
>>> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>>> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>>> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>>> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Any thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> >> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
>>> >> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
>>> >> help.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> ?Dmitry
>>> >>
>>> >>> Thanks
>>> >>> JB
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>>> >>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > Hi Jawahar.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
>>> >>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
>>> >>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
>>> >>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
>>> >>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
>>> >>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
>>> >>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
>>> >>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Regards,
>>> >>> > ?Dmitry
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
>>> >>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
>>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
>>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
>>> >>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Thanks
>>> >>> >> JB
>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> >> Users mailing list
>>> >>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
>>> >>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> >>> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>
>


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Thu Jun 16 14:41:51 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:41:51 +0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikqhF6sRrBVMkK+xe5=YAY5cgPsTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinsd5p7tNDeoGNQnav4_=R64Ehokg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikqhF6sRrBVMkK+xe5=YAY5cgPsTw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87oc1x25zk.fsf@gmail.com>

Hi Jawahar.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:51:19 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I am getting a different error. I started testing on a brand new server
> 

Is it Solaris 10 or a new system?

Do you get the previous errors on the new system?

> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src   -g -O3
> -Wall -Ww
>                                              rite-strings
> -Woverloaded-virtual -MT PolyApp.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/PolyApp.Tpo -c
> 
>                                  -o PolyApp.o PolyApp.cc
> /usr/include/net/if.h:99: error: template argument required for ?struct map?
> make[3]: *** [PolyApp.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/app'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 

Solaris declares/refers common names like map in /usr/include/net/if.h
and queue in /usr/include/sys/stream.h.  These conflict with C++ STL.
Looks like the only option to fix this is to get rid of "using namespace
std".

I am afraid I am not able to provide you a quick fix for this one.  I
have added comments to the Launchpad bug #794650 [1].  Let's move
further discussion on these issues to the Launchpad, if you do not mind.

Regards,
  Dmitry

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650

> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I did try the --with-zlib=/usr/local and it does says it finds it but
> > then it complains about not having the gzip compression feature...I'll
> > try the patch now.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Jawahar.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:53:18 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Dmitry
> >>>
> >>> I installed gcc 4.4.2 and am trying to install polygraph and i got the
> >>> following 2 errors
> >>>
> >>> 1) it complains about not finding zlin 1.2.0.4 or later but have 1.2.5 installed
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is it installed in non-standard path (i.e. not in /usr)? ?If this is the
> >> case, try configure --with-zlib=/path/to/zlib. ?This path should have
> >> zlib headers (in include/) and library (in lib/).
> >>
> >>> 2) so i tried ?with the -without-zlib option and then i get this error
> >>>
> >>> In file included from ZLib.cc:9:0:
> >>> ../../src/xstd/ZLib.h:14:29: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration
> >>> mv -f .deps/ZLib.Tpo .deps/ZLib.Po
> >>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src ? -g -O3
> >>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -MT gadgets.o -MD -MP -MF
> >>> .deps/gadgets.Tpo -c -o gadgets.o gadgets.cc
> >>> gadgets.cc: In function 'double xceil(double, double)':
> >>> gadgets.cc:32:41: error: 'ceilf' was not declared in this scope
> >>> gadgets.cc:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> >>> make[3]: *** [gadgets.o] Error 1
> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Polygraph checks if ceilf(3) is available on the system. ?Apparently,
> >> Solaris has ceilf(3) implemented (that is why the configure check
> >> succeeds), but does not declare it in math.h. ?Attached patch is a
> >> workaround to avoid ceilf(3) usage.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> ?Dmitry
> >>
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
> >>> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
> >>> > build the latest version...
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> >>> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> >>> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> Dmitry
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
> >>> >>> getting a different error..
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
> >>> >>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
> >>> >>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
> >>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
> >>> >>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
> >>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
> >>> >>> Please submit a full bug report,
> >>> >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> >>> >>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> >>> >>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
> >>> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
> >>> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
> >>> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >>> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
> >>> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
> >>> >> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
> >>> >> help.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards,
> >>> >> ?Dmitry
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Thanks
> >>> >>> JB
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> >>> >>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> > Hi Jawahar.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
> >>> >>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
> >>> >>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
> >>> >>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
> >>> >>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
> >>> >>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
> >>> >>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
> >>> >>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Regards,
> >>> >>> > ?Dmitry
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
> >>> >>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
> >>> >>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> Thanks
> >>> >>> >> JB
> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> >> Users mailing list
> >>> >>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
> >>> >>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>
> >


From jbalakri at gmail.com  Thu Jun 16 14:49:10 2011
From: jbalakri at gmail.com (Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB))
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:49:10 -0400
Subject: make error while installing on Solaris 10
In-Reply-To: <87oc1x25zk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimGPXEdGvdF3eoOE+kfwKo6_ybFyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8wp9q4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikb8T2v6=eFvqucHON=TfOjZ=mCTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871uz4p5lr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvZeFjkE+RZ=wN5UASZmrmaEK9ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=mWYF7351Aahj4AZ9008Yv6HHOSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqmgqrse.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinsd5p7tNDeoGNQnav4_=R64Ehokg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikqhF6sRrBVMkK+xe5=YAY5cgPsTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oc1x25zk.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikcPCS67LWhxSBzhnbhCHyp-u+Bww@mail.gmail.com>

it is Solaris 10 with gcc 4.4.2 - i had to scratch the old system
because it didn't have the latest Solaris rev.,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
<dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> Hi Jawahar.
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:51:19 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry I am getting a different error. I started testing on a brand new server
>>
>
> Is it Solaris 10 or a new system?
>
> Do you get the previous errors on the new system?
>
>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src ? -g -O3
>> -Wall -Ww
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?rite-strings
>> -Woverloaded-virtual -MT PolyApp.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/PolyApp.Tpo -c
>>
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-o PolyApp.o PolyApp.cc
>> /usr/include/net/if.h:99: error: template argument required for ?struct map?
>> make[3]: *** [PolyApp.o] Error 1
>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/app'
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>
>
> Solaris declares/refers common names like map in /usr/include/net/if.h
> and queue in /usr/include/sys/stream.h. ?These conflict with C++ STL.
> Looks like the only option to fix this is to get rid of "using namespace
> std".
>
> I am afraid I am not able to provide you a quick fix for this one. ?I
> have added comments to the Launchpad bug #794650 [1]. ?Let's move
> further discussion on these issues to the Launchpad, if you do not mind.
>
> Regards,
> ?Dmitry
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
>> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I did try the --with-zlib=/usr/local and it does says it finds it but
>> > then it complains about not having the gzip compression feature...I'll
>> > try the patch now.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Jawahar.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:53:18 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Dmitry
>> >>>
>> >>> I installed gcc 4.4.2 and am trying to install polygraph and i got the
>> >>> following 2 errors
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) it complains about not finding zlin 1.2.0.4 or later but have 1.2.5 installed
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Is it installed in non-standard path (i.e. not in /usr)? ?If this is the
>> >> case, try configure --with-zlib=/path/to/zlib. ?This path should have
>> >> zlib headers (in include/) and library (in lib/).
>> >>
>> >>> 2) so i tried ?with the -without-zlib option and then i get this error
>> >>>
>> >>> In file included from ZLib.cc:9:0:
>> >>> ../../src/xstd/ZLib.h:14:29: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration
>> >>> mv -f .deps/ZLib.Tpo .deps/ZLib.Po
>> >>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -I../.. -I../../src -I../.. -I../../src ? -g -O3
>> >>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -MT gadgets.o -MD -MP -MF
>> >>> .deps/gadgets.Tpo -c -o gadgets.o gadgets.cc
>> >>> gadgets.cc: In function 'double xceil(double, double)':
>> >>> gadgets.cc:32:41: error: 'ceilf' was not declared in this scope
>> >>> gadgets.cc:47:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>> >>> make[3]: *** [gadgets.o] Error 1
>> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> >>> `/export/home/jawahar/install/polygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Polygraph checks if ceilf(3) is available on the system. ?Apparently,
>> >> Solaris has ceilf(3) implemented (that is why the configure check
>> >> succeeds), but does not declare it in math.h. ?Attached patch is a
>> >> workaround to avoid ceilf(3) usage.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> ?Dmitry
>> >>
>> >>> JB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)
>> >>> <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I am using version 4.4.2 from sunfreeware.com.. let me see if i can
>> >>> > build the latest version...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> >>> > <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:39:08 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> Dmitry
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. The build went further than before but I am
>> >>> >>> getting a different error..
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> init2.c:37: ?assertion failed: ((64 - 0)+0) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8) * 8 &&
>> >>> >>> sizeof(mp_limb_t) == (((64 - 0)+0)/8)
>> >>> >>> In file included from rndDistrs.cc:11:
>> >>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h: In member function ?virtual double
>> >>> >>> UnifDistr::sdev() const?:
>> >>> >>> ../../src/xstd/rndDistrs.h:38: internal compiler error: Abort
>> >>> >>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> >>> >>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> >>> >>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>> >>> >>> make[3]: *** [rndDistrs.o] Error 1
>> >>> >>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src/xstd'
>> >>> >>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> >>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2/src'
>> >>> >>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> >>> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>> >>> >>> `/export/data/home/jawahar/install/webpolygraph/polygraph-4.3.2'
>> >>> >>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> This is a gcc bug. ?I do not think I saw this problem on any gcc version
>> >>> >> I tried. ?Are you using an unstable gcc version? ?Updating gcc should
>> >>> >> help.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Regards,
>> >>> >> ?Dmitry
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> >>> JB
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
>> >>> >>> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > Hi Jawahar.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:03:55 -0400, "Jawahar Balakrishnan (JB)" <jbalakri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >> I tried version 4.3.2 and 4.0.11 but i get the same error when i
>> >>> >>> >> execute make. Any ideas/thoughts will be appreciated.
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > The errors are in code related to IPv6 network aliases creation.
>> >>> >>> > Unfortunately, there is no portable API for this stuff and there is no
>> >>> >>> > Solaris support in Polygraph (our primary platforms are Linux and
>> >>> >>> > FreeBSD). ?As a quick hack, you may try commenting out the following
>> >>> >>> > define in src/xstd/InetIfReq.h:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > ?// Assume we are on Linux if here
>> >>> >>> > ?#define HAVE_TYPE_LINUX_IN6_IFREQ 1
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > This hack should work for you as long as you do not use IPv6 aliases.
>> >>> >>> > Hopefully, the rest of the code would build fine.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > I opened bug #794650 [1] on Launchpad to track Solaris build issues.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Regards,
>> >>> >>> > ?Dmitry
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/polygraph/+bug/794650
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc: In constructor ?Inet6IfAliasReq::Inet6IfAliasReq(const
>> >>> >>> >> String&, const InAddress&, const InAddress&)?:
>> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:38: error: ?SIOCGIFINDEX? was not declared in this scope
>> >>> >>> >> InetIfReq.cc:40: error: ?struct ifreq? has no member named ?ifr_ifindex?
>> >>> >>> >> make[3]: *** [InetIfReq.o] Error 1
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> Thanks
>> >>> >>> >> JB
>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >>> >> Users mailing list
>> >>> >>> >> Users at web-polygraph.org
>> >>> >>> >> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >
>


From unjc.email at gmail.com  Mon Jun 20 14:02:19 2011
From: unjc.email at gmail.com (unjc email)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:02:19 -0400
Subject: Busty requests
Message-ID: <BANLkTik17=OnNkR2JUJQgmEbJxsx203fHg@mail.gmail.com>

We are testing the NTLM authentication with 200 robots workload and
slowly ramp it up. We saw 120 bursting new requests from new
connections in 1 second at around 10th minutes, which overloaded the
authentication helpers in Squid.

It seems like the robots are clumping together with their
authentication requests? we are reauthenticating about every 30
seconds, so we don?t expect to see more then a handful of
authentication requests in any one second, but we are seeing them very
bursty.

I hope this is clear enough that you might be able to shed some light.



Thanks in advance for any help you can offer,
Jacky


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Mon Jun 20 15:07:31 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:07:31 +0400
Subject: Busty requests
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik17=OnNkR2JUJQgmEbJxsx203fHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTik17=OnNkR2JUJQgmEbJxsx203fHg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <877h8g5yoc.fsf@gmail.com>

Hi Jacky.

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:02:19 -0400, unjc email <unjc.email at gmail.com> wrote:
> We are testing the NTLM authentication with 200 robots workload and
> slowly ramp it up. We saw 120 bursting new requests from new
> connections in 1 second at around 10th minutes, which overloaded the
> authentication helpers in Squid.
> 
> It seems like the robots are clumping together with their
> authentication requests? we are reauthenticating about every 30
> seconds, so we don?t expect to see more then a handful of
> authentication requests in any one second, but we are seeing them very
> bursty.
> 
> I hope this is clear enough that you might be able to shed some light.
> 

Can you give more details on how reauthentication works?  IIRC we
suggested you several options, but I do not know which one you
implemented.  In the last email you asked me about how to configure
Robot sessions, so I assume you use sessions to make Polygraph
reauthenticate itself and workaround the issue originally reported by
Jacky.  If this is the case, than sessions are likely what is causing
the problem.  If session busy_period goal is time-based
(i.e. busy_period.duration is set) and a constant idle_period_duration,
e.g.:

  Session S = {
    busy_period.duration = 30sec;
    idle_period_duration = const(10sec);
  };

Polygraph restarts all Robots every 40sec.  There is no randomness, all
Robots would be started at the same time (well, not exactly the same,
but very close, especially if you are using a single Polygraph process).

If this is the problem indeed, you may try to use a non-constant
distribution for idle_period_duration.

Regards,
  Dmitry

> 
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer,
> Jacky


From unjc.email at gmail.com  Mon Jun 20 17:50:29 2011
From: unjc.email at gmail.com (unjc email)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:50:29 -0400
Subject: Busty requests
In-Reply-To: <877h8g5yoc.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTik17=OnNkR2JUJQgmEbJxsx203fHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8g5yoc.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTimuAZLTdmazTHC3JnvH=PaQj8gCDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Thanks so much for your reply.  After the email I had with you last
time, we figured it was some setting with the CSP that caused the
problem with the persistent connection.  Due to that, we don't need to
implement session in the workload.  However, we encountered another
problem (that is what Kevin Harris described in his last email).   We
will try to send you a copy of our workload and hope you can help us
sort out what is causing the bursting requests.

As like Kevin said, we are testing NTLM authentication with persistent
connection value set to 30.   We have set a constant request rate for
robots in the test.   I suppose you will see the details of the test
by the time we send you the workload file.

Greatly appreciate your help again.



Thanks,
Jacky


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
<dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> Hi Jacky.
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:02:19 -0400, unjc email <unjc.email at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We are testing the NTLM authentication with 200 robots workload and
>> slowly ramp it up. We saw 120 bursting new requests from new
>> connections in 1 second at around 10th minutes, which overloaded the
>> authentication helpers in Squid.
>>
>> It seems like the robots are clumping together with their
>> authentication requests? we are reauthenticating about every 30
>> seconds, so we don?t expect to see more then a handful of
>> authentication requests in any one second, but we are seeing them very
>> bursty.
>>
>> I hope this is clear enough that you might be able to shed some light.
>>
>
> Can you give more details on how reauthentication works? ?IIRC we
> suggested you several options, but I do not know which one you
> implemented. ?In the last email you asked me about how to configure
> Robot sessions, so I assume you use sessions to make Polygraph
> reauthenticate itself and workaround the issue originally reported by
> Jacky. ?If this is the case, than sessions are likely what is causing
> the problem. ?If session busy_period goal is time-based
> (i.e. busy_period.duration is set) and a constant idle_period_duration,
> e.g.:
>
> ?Session S = {
> ? ?busy_period.duration = 30sec;
> ? ?idle_period_duration = const(10sec);
> ?};
>
> Polygraph restarts all Robots every 40sec. ?There is no randomness, all
> Robots would be started at the same time (well, not exactly the same,
> but very close, especially if you are using a single Polygraph process).
>
> If this is the problem indeed, you may try to use a non-constant
> distribution for idle_period_duration.
>
> Regards,
> ?Dmitry
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer,
>> Jacky
>


From unjc.email at gmail.com  Tue Jun 21 17:51:39 2011
From: unjc.email at gmail.com (unjc email)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:51:39 -0400
Subject: Busty requests
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimuAZLTdmazTHC3JnvH=PaQj8gCDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTik17=OnNkR2JUJQgmEbJxsx203fHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<877h8g5yoc.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimuAZLTdmazTHC3JnvH=PaQj8gCDw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikHA_yfJUjuJzf-y4wU9OZxLeMQfQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

I am not sure if you have received the workload file from my work
email.  If not, attached is the pg file we are using for our CSP test.
 Could you please have a look and see if there is any problem with the
setup that causes the bursty traffic.



Thanks,
Jacky


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:50 PM, unjc email <unjc.email at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks so much for your reply. ?After the email I had with you last
> time, we figured it was some setting with the CSP that caused the
> problem with the persistent connection. ?Due to that, we don't need to
> implement session in the workload. ?However, we encountered another
> problem (that is what Kevin Harris described in his last email). ? We
> will try to send you a copy of our workload and hope you can help us
> sort out what is causing the bursting requests.
>
> As like Kevin said, we are testing NTLM authentication with persistent
> connection value set to 30. ? We have set a constant request rate for
> robots in the test. ? I suppose you will see the details of the test
> by the time we send you the workload file.
>
> Greatly appreciate your help again.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jacky
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin
> <dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jacky.
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:02:19 -0400, unjc email <unjc.email at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We are testing the NTLM authentication with 200 robots workload and
>>> slowly ramp it up. We saw 120 bursting new requests from new
>>> connections in 1 second at around 10th minutes, which overloaded the
>>> authentication helpers in Squid.
>>>
>>> It seems like the robots are clumping together with their
>>> authentication requests? we are reauthenticating about every 30
>>> seconds, so we don?t expect to see more then a handful of
>>> authentication requests in any one second, but we are seeing them very
>>> bursty.
>>>
>>> I hope this is clear enough that you might be able to shed some light.
>>>
>>
>> Can you give more details on how reauthentication works? ?IIRC we
>> suggested you several options, but I do not know which one you
>> implemented. ?In the last email you asked me about how to configure
>> Robot sessions, so I assume you use sessions to make Polygraph
>> reauthenticate itself and workaround the issue originally reported by
>> Jacky. ?If this is the case, than sessions are likely what is causing
>> the problem. ?If session busy_period goal is time-based
>> (i.e. busy_period.duration is set) and a constant idle_period_duration,
>> e.g.:
>>
>> ?Session S = {
>> ? ?busy_period.duration = 30sec;
>> ? ?idle_period_duration = const(10sec);
>> ?};
>>
>> Polygraph restarts all Robots every 40sec. ?There is no randomness, all
>> Robots would be started at the same time (well, not exactly the same,
>> but very close, especially if you are using a single Polygraph process).
>>
>> If this is the problem indeed, you may try to use a non-constant
>> distribution for idle_period_duration.
>>
>> Regards,
>> ?Dmitry
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer,
>>> Jacky
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CSP_constant_load_M1.pg
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10761 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.web-polygraph.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110621/6aaf0f8a/attachment.obj>

From conlon at yassl.com  Thu Jun 30 22:08:49 2011
From: conlon at yassl.com (Chris Conlon)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:08:49 -0600
Subject: Example of SSL workload
Message-ID: <FB0B1E33-B53C-4248-B061-B873B12C5695@yassl.com>

Hi,

Does anyone have an example of a workload that generates HTTPS traffic?

Thanks,
Chris


From dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com  Thu Jun 30 22:27:04 2011
From: dmitry.kurochkin at measurement-factory.com (Dmitry Kurochkin)
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:27:04 +0400
Subject: Example of SSL workload
In-Reply-To: <FB0B1E33-B53C-4248-B061-B873B12C5695@yassl.com>
References: <FB0B1E33-B53C-4248-B061-B873B12C5695@yassl.com>
Message-ID: <877h83uf9j.fsf@gmail.com>

Hi Chris.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:08:49 -0600, Chris Conlon <conlon at yassl.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone have an example of a workload that generates HTTPS traffic?
> 

Attached is a simple SSL workload.  You will need set the SSL
configuration file in the workload.  Web Polygraph SSL-related
documentation and a sample SSL configuration file are available at [1]
and [2].

Regards,
  Dmitry

[1] http://www.web-polygraph.org/docs/reference/models/ssl.html
[2] http://www.web-polygraph.org/docs/reference/models/myssl.conf

> Thanks,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at web-polygraph.org
> http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: simple_ssl.pg
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1328 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.web-polygraph.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110701/d120a987/attachment.obj>